Yudha Pradana, Cecep Darmawan, Rahmat, Leni Anggraeni

Penguatan Keterlibatan Warga Negara berupa Political Voice dan Civic Activity melalui Komunitas Kewarganegaraan

Introduction

Penguatan keterlibatan warga negara berupa political voice dan civic activity melalui komunitas kewarganegaraan. Studi ini mengungkap penguatan keterlibatan warga negara (political voice, civic activity) melalui komunitas kewarganegaraan. Memanfaatkan platform digital, penelitian ini menunjukkan bagaimana komunitas memperjuangkan kebaikan bersama.

Abstract

This study aims to reveal how reflection on empowering civic communities serves as a forum for strengthening civic engagement, particularly in the realms of political voice and civic activity. Civic engagement is a significant aspect of the discourse on cultivating smart and good citizen, especially given the technological advances that can optimize widely recognized and accessible digital platforms. This study employs a phenomenological method with a qualitative approach to explore the reflections of civic communities on enhancing civic engagement. Data collection involves interviews and documentation studies, with data analysis conducted using Atlas.ti. The results indicate that strengthening civic engagement through civic communities is grounded in the community's vision and movement patterns, particularly by leveraging digital platforms. For instance, the Bareng Warga Community uses change.org to conduct online petitions as a form of political voice, while the Nusa Bumi Lestari Community utilizes kitabisa.com for crowdfunding as a form of civic activity. Additionally, the collaboration and networking among civic communities play a crucial role in reinforcing civic engagement, enabling citizens to be dedicated and committed to achieving the common good.

Review

This study offers a timely and relevant exploration into the critical role of civic communities in fostering political voice and civic activity, thereby strengthening civic engagement. In an era increasingly defined by digital connectivity, the paper’s focus on how technological advancements can optimize citizen participation aligns well with contemporary discourse on cultivating "smart and good citizens." The stated aim of revealing how reflection on empowering civic communities serves this purpose is commendable, suggesting a qualitative depth to understanding the motivations and strategies behind these initiatives. The abstract effectively highlights the practical application of digital platforms, which is a significant strength and a valuable contribution to the field. Methodologically, the study employs a phenomenological approach with a qualitative design, utilizing interviews and documentation studies, with data analysis conducted using Atlas.ti. This methodology appears well-suited to exploring the reflections and lived experiences of civic communities regarding their engagement efforts. The findings indicate that the effectiveness of strengthening civic engagement is deeply rooted in the community's vision and operational patterns, particularly through the strategic leveraging of digital platforms. The abstract provides compelling examples, such as the Bareng Warga Community using change.org for online petitions and the Nusa Bumi Lestari Community utilizing kitabisa.com for crowdfunding, clearly illustrating the practical manifestations of political voice and civic activity. Furthermore, the emphasis on collaboration and networking among these communities underscores a crucial element for reinforcing collective dedication towards the common good. While the abstract provides a strong foundation, further elaboration in the full paper could enhance its impact. It would be beneficial to delve deeper into the specific nature of "reflection" mentioned as a key aspect of the study; understanding how this reflection is analyzed and what unique insights it yields beyond the observed activities would strengthen the findings. Additionally, while specific digital platforms are mentioned, a more nuanced discussion on the *mechanisms* through which these platforms actively *strengthen* engagement—beyond mere usage—could provide richer theoretical and practical implications. For instance, what specific features, community-led practices, or emergent social dynamics on these platforms contribute to enhanced political voice and civic activity? Addressing these points could further solidify the paper's contribution to understanding the intricate relationship between digital tools, community dynamics, and profound civic engagement.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.