Meysa Malika, Berlianti Berlianti

Penggunaan Bahasa Isyarat SIBI dan BISINDO untuk Siswa Tuli di Sekolah Luar Biasa Negeri Pembina Medan

Introduction

Penggunaan bahasa isyarat sibi dan bisindo untuk siswa tuli di sekolah luar biasa negeri pembina medan. Pelajari penggunaan bahasa isyarat SIBI dan BISINDO sebagai komunikasi utama siswa tuli di SLBN Pembina Medan. Pahami perannya dalam pendidikan khusus.

Abstract

Sign language is the primary form of communication for deaf individuals to convey ideas, thoughts, and receive information from others.

Review

The title, "Penggunaan Bahasa Isyarat SIBI dan BISINDO untuk Siswa Tuli di Sekolah Luar Biasa Negeri Pembina Medan," immediately highlights a critical and highly relevant topic within deaf education: the practical application and coexistence of different sign language systems. The abstract, while brief, appropriately recognizes sign language as the fundamental mode of communication for deaf individuals. The study's focus, as indicated by the title, appears to be an investigation or analysis of how SIBI (Sistem Isyarat Bahasa Indonesia) and BISINDO (Bahasa Isyarat Indonesia) are utilized by deaf students in a specific institutional setting, the State Special School Pembina Medan. This context-specific approach promises valuable insights into real-world educational practices in Indonesia. However, a significant drawback arises from the brevity and generality of the provided abstract. It functions more as an introductory statement about the importance of sign language rather than a concise summary of the research itself. A proper abstract must articulate the study's specific objectives, the methodology employed, the key findings, and the main conclusions or implications. Without these essential components, it is impossible for a reviewer to assess the rigor of the research design, the validity of the data collection and analysis, or the originality and significance of the contributions the paper makes to the field of deaf education. The current abstract offers no basis for evaluating the study's scientific merit or methodological soundness. Despite the severe limitations of the abstract, the topic itself holds substantial potential for informing pedagogical practices and policy regarding deaf education in Indonesia, especially concerning the ongoing debate between SIBI and BISINDO. To maximize its impact and allow for proper academic scrutiny, the abstract urgently needs comprehensive revision. It must be expanded to clearly outline the research questions, the specific methods used (e.g., qualitative case study, survey, experimental design), the participants involved, the primary results or observations, and the main conclusions drawn from these findings. A detailed and informative abstract is crucial for reviewers to understand the paper's contribution and for the article to effectively reach its intended audience.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.