Juliano Rodrigues Pimentel

O impacto da tradição e da historiografia no ensino do conceito de desconstrução para a Comunicação

Introduction

O impacto da tradição e da historiografia no ensino do conceito de desconstrução para a comunicação. Explore o impacto da tradição e historiografia no ensino da desconstrução para a Comunicação. Descubra um modelo com sugestões teóricas e metodológicas.

Abstract

O tema deste estudo é o ensino da desconstrução. Notou-se uma ausência de artigos sobre o ensino em nível superior da Comunicação, por isso elaborou-se uma reflexão sobre o impacto dos conceitos de tradição e historiografia no ensino da desconstrução. A discussão abordou a legitimação historiográfica de uma tradição e a desconstrução como a ruptura de uma hegemonia legitimada pela historiografia. Os resultados contemplam um modelo de ensino do conceito com sugestões teóricas e metodológicas.

Review

The article, "O impacto da tradição e da historiografia no ensino do conceito de desconstrução para a Comunicação," addresses a timely and significant pedagogical challenge: effectively teaching deconstruction within higher education Communication programs. The authors correctly identify a notable gap in the literature concerning specific instructional strategies for this complex philosophical concept in the Communication field. By framing their study as a reflection on the influence of tradition and historiography, the work promises to offer a nuanced understanding of the systemic challenges inherent in teaching a concept designed to critique established frameworks. The core of the discussion, as outlined in the abstract, delves into the critical interplay between the historiographical legitimization of academic traditions and deconstruction's role in challenging such hegemonies. This conceptual approach is particularly valuable, as it moves beyond mere pedagogical techniques to explore the foundational intellectual biases that can impede the understanding and application of deconstruction. The article appears to articulate how established historical narratives and disciplinary traditions can inadvertently reinforce the very structures that deconstruction seeks to question, thereby complicating its instruction. A deeper exposition of the *nature* of this "reflection" and how it rigorously connects tradition/historiography to specific teaching challenges would be beneficial. A significant strength and contribution of this work lies in its concrete outcome: the development of a teaching model complemented by theoretical and methodological suggestions. This practical application, stemming from a robust theoretical reflection, directly addresses the identified pedagogical gap. Such a model holds considerable potential for educators in Communication studies, providing actionable strategies to demystify deconstruction and foster critical thinking among students. The article's focus on bridging complex theoretical discussions with practical instructional tools positions it as a valuable resource that can stimulate further research into the efficacy of the proposed model and its applicability to other challenging concepts in the humanities and social sciences.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.