Pavel Skorupa

Metaphorical Toponyms of Present-Day Vilnius County: Extending Toponymy Research through Cognitive Metaphor Theory

Introduction

Metaphorical toponyms of present-day vilnius county: extending toponymy research through cognitive metaphor theory. This study applies Cognitive Metaphor Theory to metaphorical toponyms in Vilnius County, expanding onomastic research. Discover how language, cognition, and culture shape place names and geographical features.

Abstract

Taking present-day Vilnius County, which marks the cultural and linguistic periphery, as a case study, the attempt is made in this paper to expand the horizons of traditional onomastic research by introducing Cognitive Metaphor Theory (CMT) as an innovative approach to understanding the motivation of toponyms. Onomastic research has traditionally focused on toponyms’ etymology, derivation, and historical context. In contrast, this article explores how the application of CMT enhances our understanding of the cognitive processes inherent in toponymy. In this way, this study contributes to advancing the disciplinary field of cognitive onomastics by providing insights into how language and cognition intertwine in the conceptualization and naming of geographical features. Rooted in cognitive linguistics, CMT assumes that abstract concepts are often understood and structured through metaphors derived from tangible experiences. In the context of toponymy, this research investigates how place names are not merely linguistic labels for geographic locations but are inherently linked to cognitive structures and mental representations. CMT facilitates our understanding of toponyms’ linguistic and historical dimensions and uncovers the cognitive processes underlying their creation and interpretation. By bridging the traditional onomastic research with a cognitive approach, this novel perspective offers a deeper insight into the complex interplay of language, cognition, and geographical space. The analysis integrates traditional onomastic research methods with Cognitive Onomastics principles, utilizing frameworks from both Lithuanian and foreign scholars to classify selected Vilnius County toponyms through etymological, derivational, and semantic analyses, while also examining associated extralinguistic data. The analysis found that metaphorical toponyms in Vilnius County, though relatively uncommon, carry symbolic or cultural meaning. A total of 38 metaphorical names were identified among limnonyms, potamonyms, and oikonyms, highlighting their role in depicting the interplay between language, culture, and the environment.

Review

This paper, "Metaphorical Toponyms of Present-Day Vilnius County: Extending Toponymy Research through Cognitive Metaphor Theory," offers a compelling and innovative approach to the study of place names. By focusing on Vilnius County, a region characterized by its cultural and linguistic diversity, the authors propose to significantly expand the traditional horizons of onomastic research. The central contribution lies in introducing Cognitive Metaphor Theory (CMT) as a robust framework to understand the motivational underpinnings of toponyms, moving beyond conventional etymological, derivational, and historical analyses to explore the deeper cognitive processes involved in naming geographical features. The methodology described by the authors effectively bridges established onomastic practices with the principles of cognitive linguistics. The study integrates traditional methods of etymological, derivational, and semantic analyses with insights from Cognitive Onomastics, leveraging frameworks from both Lithuanian and foreign scholars. This interdisciplinary integration is designed to enhance our understanding of how language and cognition intertwine in the conceptualization and naming of geographical space, thereby advancing the burgeoning field of cognitive onomastics. The inclusion of extralinguistic data further promises a comprehensive and nuanced analysis of the selected toponyms. Preliminary findings indicate that, while metaphorical toponyms may be relatively uncommon in Vilnius County, the 38 identified names (across limnonyms, potamonyms, and oikonyms) carry significant symbolic and cultural weight. This highlights their crucial role in depicting the complex interplay between language, culture, and the environment. The study's novel perspective, combining rigorous traditional methods with a cognitive approach, offers valuable insights into a specific regional context while simultaneously providing a replicable framework that can profoundly enrich the broader fields of toponymy and cognitive linguistics.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.