Editors, Environment

Medical Treatment by X-Rays and Other Radiation

Introduction

Medical treatment by x-rays and other radiation. Explore medical uses of X-rays & radiation for diagnosis (imaging internal structures) and treatment. Learn how practitioners interpret X-ray shadows for patient care.

Abstract

When you are subjected to radiation, for medical purposes, the radiations are applied for one of two reasons : either that the practitioner may through you, or that he may do work (that is, expend energy) on the surface of your body or on more deeply-seated zones. If he be employing X-rays to see through you, he may cast X-ray shadows of varying density on to a fluorescent screen so that light rays similarly varying in intensity are passed on to his eyes, and he interprets the shadows in terms of those normal or abnormal contents of your body that are casting the shadows; or he may cause the X-ray shadows to be cast on a suitable photographic plate, where the energy of the X-rays is absorbed by the plate emulsion, so that on development he can observe the relative absorption of the X-rays by different portions of the intervened body.

Review

This submission, titled "Medical Treatment by X-Rays and Other Radiation," presents a rudimentary, albeit historically interesting, introduction to the early applications of radiation in medicine. The abstract outlines two primary uses: diagnostic imaging, framed as "seeing through" the patient, and therapeutic intervention, described as doing "work" or expending energy on or within the body. The descriptive language employed, such as "practitioner may through you" and the subsequent elaboration on X-ray shadows cast on fluorescent screens or photographic plates, highlights a foundational understanding of radiography. For its time, this abstract likely aimed to provide a broad overview of the emerging capabilities of radiation technology in medical practice. However, from a contemporary scientific and medical perspective, the abstract falls significantly short of the rigor and detail expected for a journal publication. The language is notably archaic and lacks precision; terms like "may through you" or "do work" are vague and do not align with modern scientific terminology. While it details the diagnostic application of X-rays via shadow interpretation and photographic absorption, the equally important therapeutic aspect is left almost entirely undeveloped, receiving only a conceptual mention. There is a complete absence of information regarding specific medical conditions treated, patient populations, dose considerations, safety protocols, efficacy data, or comparative analyses, which are all critical components of any meaningful medical abstract. In conclusion, this abstract functions more as an introductory paragraph from an early 20th-century textbook than a standalone summary of research for a modern journal. Its historical value lies in its portrayal of the nascent understanding and conceptualization of radiation medicine. However, as a submission for peer review today, it would require substantial expansion and modernization. A publishable abstract would need to clearly articulate specific research questions, methodologies, findings (even if theoretical at the time), and the clinical implications of "other radiation" in far greater detail, moving beyond mere descriptive overview to analytical and evidence-based reporting.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.