Michael Allen

Male Cults Revisited: The Politics of Blood versus Semen

Introduction

Male cults revisited: the politics of blood versus semen. Explore male cults and initiations in Melanesia, analyzing the politics of blood versus semen. This study revisits Levi-Strauss's kinship structures in harmonic societies.

Abstract

IN 1957, as a fourth-year honours undergraduate at SydneyUniversity, I carried out a library-based study of male initiations inMelanesia, the results of which were subsequently published in1967 in a small book entitled Male Cults and Secret Initiations inMelanesia.1 Though at that time I was unaware of Levi-Strauss's(1969) comparative study of what he termed the 'elementarystructures of kinship', I nevertheless developed an argument inwhich I contended that the most elaborate compulsory maleinitiations were consistently found in societies that Levi-Straussreferred to as harmonic, that is to say, in societies in which the sameunilineal principle, whether patrilineal or matrilineal, prevailed bothin descent and in post-marital residence, as distinct from thedisharmonic variety, where there was a disjunction between thedescent and residence rules.

Review

This paper, titled "Male Cults Revisited: The Politics of Blood versus Semen," offers a fascinating historical and analytical re-examination of the author's earlier work on male initiations in Melanesia. The abstract establishes the paper's foundation in a 1957 undergraduate study, later published in 1967, where the author independently developed an argument linking elaborate compulsory male initiations to what were later termed "harmonic" societies by Levi-Strauss. This refers to societies where a consistent unilineal principle (patrilineal or matrilineal) governs both descent and post-marital residence, in contrast to "disharmonic" varieties. The core promise here is an updated engagement with this foundational insight, framed within the broader context of kinship studies. The initial premise demonstrates a remarkable prescience on the author's part, identifying a crucial structural correlation even before explicit engagement with Levi-Strauss's theoretical framework. This historical perspective lends considerable weight to the paper, highlighting an early, independent anthropological insight that resonates with significant later scholarship. The revisiting of this work provides an opportunity to reflect on the evolution of anthropological thought regarding kinship, ritual, and social structure in Melanesia. The paper's strength lies in its potential to not only reiterate this significant correlation but also to enrich it with contemporary understanding, using the author's own intellectual journey as a guiding thread. While the abstract clearly sets up the structural argument, the intriguing subtitle, "The Politics of Blood versus Semen," remains largely unexplored. This suggests a deeper layer of analysis beyond the purely structural, delving into the symbolic and political dimensions of bodily fluids within male cults. A comprehensive review would anticipate how this rich symbolic content will be integrated with the structural argument about harmonic societies. It would be valuable to see how the "revisited" aspect of the title extends beyond a historical recounting to incorporate more recent ethnographic insights from Melanesia or engage with critical developments in gender and ritual studies since the original publication, thereby fully realizing the "politics" implied in the subtitle.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.