Alifia Nurshadrina Hermawan, Alvika Jienni Mulia Pangestuti, Bunga Aulia Salsabila Putri

Konsep Birokrasi Korupsi di Indonesia dalam Teori Bureaucratic Oversupply Model

Introduction

Konsep birokrasi korupsi di indonesia dalam teori bureaucratic oversupply model. Menganalisis konsep korupsi birokrasi Indonesia dengan teori bureaucratic oversupply. Pahami penyebab, peluang, pencegahan, dan pentingnya reformasi serta tata kelola baik.

Abstract

This writing analyzes the phenomenon of corruption in the Indonesian bureaucracy using a normative juridical approach and bureaucratic oversupply theory.  This research aims to understand the concept of bureaucracy, opportunities for corruption in bureaucracy, and efforts to prevent it. The research results show that corruption in the Indonesian bureaucracy is still a serious problem caused by various factors, both internal and external. Bureaucratic oversupply theory provides a deeper understanding of how bureaucratic structure and behavior can create conditions conducive to corruption. This research concludes that to overcome the problem of corruption, comprehensive bureaucratic reform is needed, including strengthening supervision, improving the quality of human resources, and implementing good governance.

Review

The article, "Konsep Birokrasi Korupsi di Indonesia dalam Teori Bureaucratic Oversupply Model," addresses a highly pertinent and critical issue: the persistent problem of corruption within the Indonesian bureaucracy. Utilizing a normative juridical approach alongside the Bureaucratic Oversupply Model, the research aims to provide a deeper understanding of bureaucratic dynamics, the opportunities they create for corruption, and potential prevention strategies. The abstract effectively highlights that corruption remains a severe problem driven by multifaceted internal and external factors, establishing the clear relevance and timeliness of this study. A significant strength of this work appears to be its application of the Bureaucratic Oversupply Model. This theoretical lens promises to offer a nuanced understanding of how inherent structural and behavioral aspects of bureaucracy itself can inadvertently foster environments ripe for corruption, moving beyond simplistic blame. By identifying both internal and external factors contributing to this pervasive issue, the research suggests a comprehensive diagnostic approach. The subsequent proposal of key areas for reform—strengthening supervision, improving human resources quality, and implementing good governance—points towards practical and actionable recommendations that could contribute meaningfully to policy discussions and anti-corruption efforts in Indonesia. While the abstract clearly outlines the theoretical framework and key findings, a full paper would benefit from greater detail regarding its "normative juridical approach." Specifically, clarity on the types of legal documents, regulations, and judicial precedents analyzed, and how this analysis is integrated with the theoretical model, would strengthen the methodology. Further elaboration on specific examples of bureaucratic oversupply in the Indonesian context, and the direct causal links established between this oversupply and various corruption typologies, would enhance the empirical grounding. Additionally, a more in-depth discussion on the practical challenges of implementing the proposed comprehensive reforms within the specific political and socio-cultural landscape of Indonesia would add significant value, potentially through case studies or comparative analysis.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.