Failure risk analysis on glass bowl products using failure mode and effect analysis (fmea) method at pt. Kedaung indah can, tbk. Analyze glass bowl defect risks at PT. Kedaung Indah Can using FMEA. Identify broken, cracked, and untidy color defects, prioritizing improvements by RPN values.
Kedaung Indah Can, Tbk is a manufacturer and exporter of canned/tin products and enamel steel cookware, one of which is glass bowls. During the production process, problems often arise, namely a fairly high level of product defects. These defects occur more often in the inspection process, namely the process before the product is handed over to consumers, the inspection section will check and test the product according to applicable standards and provisions. In this study, the author aims to identify the risks that occur so that they can produce high productivity and propose improvements in reducing defects. The method used to solve this problem is Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) to determine the dominant failures that cause product damage and determine the priority of repairs from the results of the Risk Priority Number (RPN) value. The results of this study indicate that there are 3 types of defects that produce RPN values, including broken glass bowls with an RPN value of 192, cracked glass bowls with an RPN value of 125 and untidy bowl colors with an RPN value of 100.
This study, titled "Failure Risk Analysis on Glass Bowl Products Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Method at PT. Kedaung Indah Can, Tbk," addresses a highly relevant issue within manufacturing: the high incidence of product defects. The abstract clearly identifies a practical problem faced by PT. Kedaung Indah Can, Tbk, specifically concerning their glass bowl production line, where defects are frequently detected during the crucial pre-consumer inspection phase. The paper's objective to identify risks, enhance productivity, and propose defect reduction strategies is commendable and directly contributes to operational efficiency and quality control within industrial settings. The methodology employed, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), is a well-established and appropriate tool for systematic risk identification and prioritization in manufacturing processes. The abstract effectively conveys that FMEA was used to pinpoint dominant failure modes and to prioritize corrective actions based on the Risk Priority Number (RPN) values. The reported results are concrete and actionable: three primary defect types were identified—broken glass bowls (RPN 192), cracked glass bowls (RPN 125), and untidy bowl colors (RPN 100). These specific RPN values provide a clear hierarchy for the company to focus its efforts, indicating that addressing broken bowls should be the highest priority. While the abstract effectively outlines the problem, methodology, and key findings, a full review would benefit from more detail on the specific improvement actions proposed as a result of the FMEA analysis. Although the study aims to propose improvements, the abstract focuses primarily on identification and prioritization. For a comprehensive contribution, the full paper should elaborate on the root causes behind these dominant defects and present concrete, actionable recommendations for their mitigation. Nevertheless, this study offers valuable insights into practical quality management, providing a clear roadmap for PT. Kedaung Indah Can, Tbk to enhance its production quality and reduce waste, thereby contributing positively to both academic understanding and industrial practice in failure risk analysis.
You need to be logged in to view the full text and Download file of this article - Failure Risk Analysis on Glass Bowl Products Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Method at PT. Kedaung Indah Can, Tbk from abdimesin .
Login to View Full Text And DownloadYou need to be logged in to post a comment.
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria