NORMILA NORMILA, Azirita Marhdalena, Hairil Anwar

EFEKTIVITAS PENYALURAN PUPUK BERSUBSIDI BAGI KELOMPOK TANI DI KECAMATAN NANGA PINOH KABUPATEN MELAWI

Introduction

Efektivitas penyaluran pupuk bersubsidi bagi kelompok tani di kecamatan nanga pinoh kabupaten melawi. Penelitian ini menganalisis efektivitas penyaluran pupuk bersubsidi bagi kelompok tani di Nanga Pinoh, Melawi. Mengungkap masalah distribusi terlambat, tidak tepat sasaran, & harga di atas ketentuan.

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektivitas dalam penyaluran pupuk bersubsidi di Desa Labai Mandiri. Permasalahan dalam Penelitian ini keterlambatan distribusi pupuk subsidi, tidak tepat sasaran, dan harga yang di atas ketentuan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif melalui pendekatan kualitatif. dapat dihasilkan dalam teori yang dikemukan oleh Silalahi (2017) mengenai efektivitas dimana teori ini dibagi menjadi tiga untuk mengukur efektivitas yaitu Pendekatan sasaran (goalsapproach) hasil yang dapat dikatakan efektif karena sasaran penyaluran sudah terealisasi dengan baik, Pendekatan sumber (systemresourceapproach) hasil yang didapatkan belum efektif karena adanya sumber data yang didapatkan tidak sesuai dengan hasil lapangan yaitu mengenai adanya kenaikan harga, dan Pendekatan proses (Internalprocessapproach) hasil yang didapatkan belum efektif karena pupuk yang disalurankan masih terlambat. Saran yaitu Pemerintah yang berkejasama dalam penyaluran pupuk bersubsidi dengan pihak distributor, pengecer kira lebih memperhatikan dalam mengoptimalkan program pupuk bersubsidi mengenai prinsip tepat jenis pupuk, jumlah pupuk yang efektif.

Review

The paper, "EFEKTIVITAS PENYALURAN PUPUK BERSUBSIDI BAGI KELOMPOK TANI DI KECAMATAN NANGA PINOH KABUPATEN MELAWI," addresses a highly relevant and critical issue concerning the distribution of subsidized fertilizers to farmer groups in Labai Mandiri Village. The research aims to assess the effectiveness of this program, explicitly highlighting pervasive problems such as distribution delays, misdirection to non-target beneficiaries, and prices exceeding regulated limits. The choice of a descriptive qualitative method is appropriate for delving into the complexities of these issues within a specific local context, offering the potential for nuanced insights into an important aspect of agricultural policy and farmer welfare. A key strength of this study is its structured approach to evaluating effectiveness through Silalahi's (2017) theoretical framework, which incorporates the goals approach, system resource approach, and internal process approach. This framework allows for a clear articulation of where the program is succeeding (e.g., goal realization in distribution) and where it demonstrably fails (e.g., system resource issues leading to inflated prices, and internal process failures resulting in chronic delays). The abstract's mention of discrepancies between data sources and field observations regarding pricing ("sumber data yang didapatkan tidak sesuai dengan hasil lapangan") is a particularly intriguing finding that, if thoroughly explored in the full paper, could provide valuable insights into accountability and oversight challenges. However, the abstract could be strengthened by briefly outlining the specific qualitative data collection methods employed (e.g., number of interviews, types of documents reviewed) to enhance methodological transparency. To maximize its impact, the full paper should delve deeper into the specific mechanisms and underlying causes of the identified inefficiencies, such as *how* fertilizers are misdirected or *why* prices are consistently above regulations. Furthermore, while the abstract offers general recommendations to the government, distributors, and retailers, the complete manuscript should provide more detailed, actionable policy implications derived directly from the qualitative findings. This would include specific strategies for optimizing the principles of "tepat jenis pupuk" (right type of fertilizer) and "jumlah pupuk yang efektif" (effective quantity of fertilizer). Overall, this research addresses a vital area for agricultural sustainability and food security, and with a comprehensive presentation of its findings and robust policy recommendations, it holds the potential to be a significant contribution to improving subsidized fertilizer programs.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.