Production Editor

Back matter

Introduction

Back matter. Discover the vital role of back matter in academic and professional publications, enhancing organization and reader access to information.

Abstract

.

Review

This submission presents significant challenges for review due to the complete absence of an abstract and an exceptionally brief title. The title, "Back matter," is highly ambiguous and provides no substantive indication of the paper's specific subject, scope, or research question. More critically, the abstract field is entirely blank. Without any summary information whatsoever, it is fundamentally impossible to ascertain the paper's purpose, methodology, key findings, or potential contribution to the field. A well-composed abstract is an indispensable component of any scholarly submission, serving as a concise yet comprehensive overview that enables reviewers and readers to quickly grasp the essence of the work. Its absence here prevents any assessment of the paper's intellectual merit, novelty, methodological rigor, or relevance to the journal's scope. Furthermore, the title "Back matter" could refer to a variety of topics—from a technical discussion of publication components to a metaphorical exploration of hidden elements—making it impossible to contextualize even a hypothetical abstract. In its current form, there is simply no content to evaluate. Given the complete lack of an abstract and the uninformative title, this submission cannot proceed to full peer review. I strongly recommend rejection in its current state. For any future resubmission, the authors must provide a comprehensive abstract that clearly outlines the paper's objectives, methods, results, and conclusions. Additionally, a more descriptive and informative title is essential to convey the paper's specific focus. Without these fundamental components, the work remains entirely opaque and unreviewable.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.