Andi Arba Octavia, Andri Winarto

ANALISIS PROSES PEMBUATAN KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK (STUDI KEPUSTAKAAN: UU TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL (TPKS) DI INDONESIA)

Introduction

Analisis proses pembuatan kebijakan publik (studi kepustakaan: uu tindak pidana kekerasan seksual (tpks) di indonesia). Analisis proses pembuatan kebijakan publik di Indonesia, fokus UU TPKS. Menjelaskan tahapan, mengidentifikasi hambatan seperti kebuntuan politik dan kurangnya partisipasi. Kontribusi untuk studi kebijakan publik.

Abstract

This research article aims to describe and analyze the process of making public policy in Indonesia on the TPKS Law (Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence). The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach with a library research method, in which data were collected from various relevant literature sources such as books, academic journals, legislative documents, and previous research reports. The data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach based on Creswell’s analytical steps, including data collection, filtering, categorization, description, and interpretation. The theoretical framework used is Nugroho’s public policy process model, which consists of six main stages: problem identification, agenda setting, policy formulation, policy legitimation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation. The results indicate that the formulation process of the UU TPKS generally aligns with the theoretical stages, although several obstacles were identified, such as political deadlock, limited understanding among implementers, and lack of public participation. This research contributes theoretically to public policy studies and opens avenues for future research, particularly in examining policy implementation at the local level and evaluating the effectiveness of the UU TPKS post-enactment.

Review

This research article tackles a highly pertinent and critical subject: the process of public policy-making in Indonesia, specifically focusing on the pivotal UU TPKS (Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence Law). The timely nature of this topic, addressing a significant societal issue, immediately establishes the paper's relevance. By employing a descriptive qualitative approach grounded in a comprehensive library research methodology, the authors aim to provide a detailed analysis of how this crucial legislation was formulated. The study promises to offer valuable insights into the complexities of policy development within the Indonesian context, making it a significant contribution to the field of public policy studies. The methodological framework is robust and clearly articulated. The reliance on diverse literature sources—including academic journals, legislative documents, and previous reports—for data collection ensures a broad base for analysis. The application of Creswell’s systematic thematic analysis steps, encompassing data collection, filtering, categorization, description, and interpretation, demonstrates a rigorous approach to qualitative data processing. Furthermore, the theoretical grounding in Nugroho’s six-stage public policy process model provides an excellent conceptual lens, allowing for a structured examination of each stage from problem identification to policy evaluation. The findings, which indicate general alignment with theoretical stages but also highlight significant obstacles such as political deadlock, limited implementer understanding, and insufficient public participation, are particularly insightful and shed light on practical challenges in policy formulation. While the study effectively describes the policy formulation process, it also implicitly highlights the inherent difficulties within public policy-making through its identification of specific obstacles. These findings carry important implications for improving governance and citizen engagement in future policy endeavors within Indonesia. The research successfully contributes to the theoretical understanding of public policy processes, particularly in an Indonesian context, by empirically applying an established model. The authors judiciously identify avenues for future research, suggesting follow-up studies on policy implementation at the local level and an evaluation of the UU TPKS’s post-enactment effectiveness. These recommendations not only underscore the paper's forward-looking perspective but also provide clear directions for expanding on this foundational analysis.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.