Shahril @ Charil Hj Marzuki, Norfizah Hayati Ahmad, Muhammad Faizal A. Gani

ANALISIS PELAN INDUK PEMBANGUNAN PENDIDIKAN (PIPP) 2006-2010 DIGUBAL BERDASARKAN PEMBANGUNAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA (2001-2010)

Introduction

Analisis pelan induk pembangunan pendidikan (pipp) 2006-2010 digubal berdasarkan pembangunan pendidikan malaysia (2001-2010). Analisis kritikal Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan (PIPP) 2006-2010 Malaysia. Artikel ini mengkaji formulasi, isu dan pelaksanaan PIPP berdasarkan Visi 2020 serta Rancangan Malaysia Kesembilan.

Abstract

This article examines and analyzes critically the National Education Blueprint (NEB) (PIPP) (2006- 2010) which has six main trusts: (i) building the nation and people that is united and pround of its national identity, (ii) developing human capital that is knowledgeable and skilled with an appreciation of pure values, (iii) strengthening national schools, making national schools the main choice without obstructing the development of vernacular schools, (iv) narrowing the education gap in term of location, socio-economic status and students abilities so that all schools and students will be given the same opportunities to achieve exellence, (v) improving teaching profession, and (vi) accelerating excellence at educational institution, through cluster schools (which are centres of excellence) so that they will become showcase or model schools.Whether the NEB had been formulated based on Vision 2020, which have nine main strategies, the Education Development Plan ( 2001- 2010 ) which has four main thrusts, namely (i) increase acess in education, (ii) increase equity in education, (iii) improve quality in education, and (iv) improve efficiency and effectiveness of education management and whilst the Ninth Malaysia Plan which has six core strategies namely (i) improveing the access to and quality of the education system at all levels, (ii) making national schools the school of choice, (iii) Producing tertiary institution of international standing, (iv) nurturing top quality research and development and scientific and innovation, and (v) Empowering women and youth and (vi) fostering a society with strong values. It is also discussed the issues and implementation of NEB.

Review

The proposed article, "ANALISIS PELAN INDUK PEMBANGUNAN PENDIDIKAN (PIPP) 2006-2010 DIGUBAL BERDASARKAN PEMBANGUNAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA (2001-2010)", presents a timely and critical examination of a pivotal national education policy. By focusing on the National Education Blueprint (NEB) 2006-2010, the paper addresses a crucial period in Malaysian educational reform. The abstract indicates a significant contribution to understanding the strategic direction and practical implications of educational development, making this a relevant piece for academics, policymakers, and educational practitioners interested in policy analysis and implementation within a national context. The article outlines a comprehensive scope, intending to scrutinize the NEB's six main trusts, which include nation-building, human capital development, strengthening national schools, and narrowing educational disparities. A key strength highlighted in the abstract is the intention to contextualize the NEB within a multi-layered policy framework, explicitly linking it to Malaysia's Vision 2020, the Education Development Plan (2001-2010), and the Ninth Malaysia Plan. This inter-policy analysis is particularly valuable, demonstrating an appreciation for the intricate tapestry of national development goals influencing educational strategies. The explicit mention of discussing "issues and implementation of NEB" further suggests a practical and grounded analysis beyond a mere descriptive mapping. The critical examination of how the NEB aligns with these overarching national strategies, coupled with a discussion of its implementation challenges, positions this article as a significant contribution to the literature on Malaysian education policy. The paper's commitment to exploring whether the NEB truly fulfilled its mandate within the context of these larger strategic documents offers a valuable retrospective analysis. Overall, this article appears poised to offer insightful perspectives on the complexities of national education policy formulation and execution, making it a relevant and valuable addition to scholarly discourse.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.