Nur Sukma Meilisa

Analisis Framing Pada Pemberitaan CNN Indonesia Terhadap Pilkada Jawa Tengah 2024

Introduction

analisis framing pada pemberitaan cnn indonesia terhadap pilkada jawa tengah 2024. Analisis framing pemberitaan CNN Indonesia pada Pilkada Jawa Tengah 2024 mengkaji bagaimana media membentuk opini publik terhadap isu politik & kandidat, serta pengaruhnya.

Abstract

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis penerapan teori framing dalam pemberitaan CNN Indonesia padaPilkada Jawa Tengah 2024. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana mediamenggambarkan isu - isu politik, seperti kontroversi politik, program unggulan, dan popularitas kandidat, yangdapat mempengaruhi persepsi masyarakat. Teori framing yang dikembangkan oleh Gamson dan Modiglianidigunakan sebagai alat analisis untuk memahami bagaimana media membentuk realitas sosial dan narasi. Hasilpenelitian menunjukkan bahwa liputan CNN Indonesia lebih dari sekadar menyebarkan informasi, ia jugamembentuk opini publik melalui pilihan kata, metafora, dan penggambaran yang dramatis. Contoh spesifikframing tersebut dapat dilihat pada pembahasan situasi Andika Perkasa dan Hendrar Prihadi, dimana PresidenJokowi digambarkan sebagai sosok penting dalam menjaga landscape politik di Jawa Tengah. Menurut penelitianini, media memiliki kemampuan yang kuat dalam menyampaikan informasi lokal sekaligus mempengaruhi politiknasional, sehingga dapat mempengaruhi hasil Pilkada secara signifikan.Kata Kunci : pilkada, framing, media, politikAbstractThe purpose of this study is to analyze the application of framing theory in CNN Indonesia’s reporting on the2024 Central Java Pilkada. Using a qualitative approach, this study examines how the media depicts politicalissues, such as political controversies, featured programs, and candidate popularity, which can influence publicperception. The framing theory developed by Gmason and Modigliani is used as an analytical tool to understandhow the media shapes social reality and narratives. The results of the study show that CNN Indonesia’s coverageis more than just disseminating information, it also shapes public opinion through dramatic word choices,metaphors, and depictions. A specific example of this framing can be seen in the discussion of the situation ofAndika Perkasa and Hendrar Prihadi, where President Jokowi is described as an important figure in maintainingthe political landscape in Central Java. According to this study, the media has a strong ability to convey localinformation while influencing national politics, so that it can significantly influence the results of the Pilkada.Keywords : pilkada, framing, media, politics

Review

This study presents a timely and highly relevant qualitative analysis of how CNN Indonesia framed its reporting on the 2024 Central Java Pilkada, utilizing the robust theoretical framework of Gamson and Modigliani's framing theory. The objective to explore how media depicts political issues, ranging from controversies to candidate popularity, and subsequently influences public perception, is critically important in understanding the dynamics of modern political communication. The abstract effectively conveys the central argument that media coverage extends beyond mere information dissemination, actively shaping public opinion through strategic choices in language and imagery, suggesting a significant role for media in constructing social reality during an electoral period. While the abstract highlights the study's key finding—that CNN Indonesia's coverage actively shapes public opinion through "dramatic word choices, metaphors, and depictions"—it would benefit from a more detailed exposition of the analytical methodology in the full paper. Specific examples, such as the framing of Andika Perkasa, Hendrar Prihadi, and President Jokowi's role, offer intriguing glimpses into the identified narratives. However, the abstract could more explicitly illustrate *how* these elements contribute to the specific framing outcomes. Furthermore, the strong assertion that media can "significantly influence the results of the Pilkada" is a substantial claim that requires thorough substantiation and a nuanced discussion of the causal mechanisms in the complete manuscript. Overall, this research addresses a crucial area in media and political studies within the Indonesian context. The focus on framing in a regional election by a prominent national media outlet offers valuable insights into the interplay between local political events and national figures. To maximize its impact, the full paper should elaborate on the specific analytical tools used to dissect "dramatic word choices" and "metaphors," provide a richer array of empirical examples, and present a more detailed argument for the asserted influence on election outcomes. This study has the potential to make a substantial contribution to understanding the media's power in shaping political discourse and public perception.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.