Soffan Marsus

An Analysis of the Diverse Structures and Performance of Government Human Resource Development in Indonesia

Introduction

An analysis of the diverse structures and performance of government human resource development in indonesia. Analyze diverse structures & performance of Indonesian government HRD. This study reveals evolving HRD roles, strategic initiatives, and COVID-19's impact on online training, boosting public sector professionalism & efficiency.

Abstract

Currently, there is a growing demand for heightened professionalism and optimal performance within government institutions, emphasizing efficiency. A discernible trend towards delineating Human Resource Development (HRD) as a distinct entity from Human Resource Management (HRM) is evident in the pursuit of achieving superior standards. This study reexamines the organizational frameworks and performance of government HRD in this evolving landscape, shedding light on the significant contributions made by government HRD to their organizations. This research is crucial for understanding the contribution of government HRD to organizational objectives. Employing qualitative methodologies, the study delves into the organizational structures of HRD entities, identifying three predominant variants: (1) an HRD function existing as a sizable specialized division, (2) a clear separation between HRD and HRM functions, and (3) HRD operating within an HRM Department. Importantly, the scope of roles and functions within HRD is observed to be expanding. Furthermore, HRD institutions are perceived to have transitioned beyond the traditional role of conducting training to actively implementing strategic human resource development initiatives. The Covid-19 pandemic has notably influenced training methodologies, leading to a substantial increase in online training over the pandemic's two-year span. This shift has resulted in breakthroughs and heightened efficiency in the implementation of training initiatives amidst the challenges posed by the pandemic. Given the rarity of studies in this field, it is anticipated that this research will be valuable in ensuring that all government entities achieve effective and efficient operations.

Review

This study addresses a highly relevant and timely topic concerning government Human Resource Development (HRD) in Indonesia, particularly against a backdrop of increasing demands for professionalism and efficiency within public institutions. The abstract effectively highlights the evolving landscape where HRD is increasingly distinguished from Human Resource Management (HRM), a crucial trend for public sector effectiveness. Using qualitative methodologies, the research provides valuable initial insights into the diverse organizational structures of government HRD, identifying three distinct variants, and notes an expansion in HRD's roles beyond traditional training to strategic initiatives. The inclusion of the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on training methodologies, specifically the surge in online training and perceived efficiency gains, adds a pertinent dimension to the analysis, making the study particularly valuable given the claimed rarity of research in this specific domain. While the abstract presents intriguing findings, several areas warrant further detail and clarification for the full paper. Firstly, although a qualitative methodology is stated, the abstract lacks crucial specifics regarding its implementation, such as the specific research design, data collection methods (e.g., interviews, focus groups, document analysis), or the sample size and types of government institutions involved. This omission makes it difficult to fully assess the rigor and potential generalizability of the findings. More critically, the study claims to analyze "performance" and identify "significant contributions" and "heightened efficiency," yet the abstract provides no indication of *how* HRD performance was conceptualized or measured. Without explicit performance indicators or criteria, claims of "breakthroughs" or that HRD has "transitioned beyond the traditional role" remain largely unsubstantiated, hindering the ability to objectively evaluate the actual impact of these structural or operational changes. In conclusion, this research holds significant potential to contribute to the understanding of government HRD in Indonesia, offering a foundational analysis of its structural diversity and evolving functions. The identified organizational variants and the acknowledgment of pandemic-driven changes are valuable starting points for a deeper exploration. For the full paper to maximize its impact and solidify its claims, it would greatly benefit from a more detailed articulation of the qualitative methodology, an explicit definition and measurement of HRD performance, and a more thorough discussion of the implications of the observed structural differences on HRD effectiveness and overall organizational objectives. Addressing these points would transform an interesting initial exploration into a robust and highly impactful contribution to the field.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.