Indah Sakina, Doni Hendrik

The development of Indonesian mass media: An analysis of political power and its influence on democracy

Introduction

The development of indonesian mass media: an analysis of political power and its influence on democracy. Indonesian mass media post-1998 Reform: analyze its impact on political power and democracy. Explores challenges like political dependence, digital disruption, and journalistic ethics.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the development of mass media in Indonesia after the 1998 Reform, focusing on its relationship with political power and its impact on democracy. Using a descriptive qualitative method, the study analyzes documents, literature, and relevant news archives to understand the dynamics of media in the context of politics and democracy. Data was collected through literature review and content analysis of mass media that have evolved since the Reform era. The results show that mass media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion, influencing political policies, and strengthening democracy in Indonesia. Since the Reform era, media has undergone significant transformation, becoming freer and more diverse, as well as serving as a channel for social control over power. However, several challenges remain, such as dependence on political interests and media owners, which affect the independence of news reporting. Additionally, rapid digital disruption and the spread of hoaxes further degrade the quality of information received by the public, lowering trust in the media. Other findings indicate that, despite efforts to maintain its role in democracy, professionalism and journalistic ethics are often neglected in an attempt to meet market demands and political interests. This study concludes that mass media must continue to maintain independence, enhance professionalism, and adhere to journalistic ethics to strengthen democracy in Indonesia, while addressing the challenges in the increasingly complex digital and political era.

Review

This study addresses a highly relevant and timely topic, exploring the intricate relationship between the development of Indonesian mass media, political power, and its influence on democracy in the post-1998 Reform era. The chosen descriptive qualitative methodology, leveraging document analysis, literature review, and content analysis of news archives, appears well-suited to capture the complex dynamics at play. The abstract effectively highlights the media's crucial role in shaping public opinion, influencing policy, and acting as a mechanism for social control, underscoring its significant transformation towards greater freedom and diversity since the Reform era. The initial findings point to a promising investigation into the media's foundational contributions to Indonesian democracy. However, while the study commendably identifies significant challenges to media independence, such as reliance on political interests and ownership, the abstract could benefit from a more explicit articulation of *how* these dependencies specifically manifest and differentially impact news reporting and democratic processes in Indonesia. The acknowledgement of rapid digital disruption, the spread of hoaxes, and the erosion of public trust are crucial, yet the abstract primarily states these problems rather than elaborating on the *mechanisms* through which they degrade information quality and journalistic ethics, particularly in the face of market and political pressures. A deeper, more nuanced analysis of the systemic forces underpinning the neglect of professionalism, beyond merely meeting market demands, would significantly strengthen the critical insights offered. In conclusion, this study offers a valuable contribution to understanding the multifaceted landscape of Indonesian mass media and its continuous struggle to uphold democratic values. The findings underscore the ongoing challenges to media independence and ethical practice within an environment fraught with political and digital complexities. The study's call for media to maintain independence, enhance professionalism, and adhere to journalistic ethics is a critical takeaway, positioning the research as a significant foundation for future studies exploring specific interventions or policy recommendations to safeguard media integrity and, by extension, strengthen Indonesian democracy in this evolving era.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.