Zakia Afdhila

PHYSICS OF BLOODSTAIN PATTERN ANALYSIS

Introduction

Physics of bloodstain pattern analysis. Explore the physics behind bloodstain pattern analysis for crime scene reconstruction. Learn about surface tension, viscosity, gravity, and impact angles in forensic science.

Abstract

Bloodstain patterns are one of the pieces of evidence that can be found at the scene. Bloodstain pattern analysis is carried out to help reconstruct the events or occurrences that caused the formation of the pattern. Analysis is based on a combination of physics, biology and mathematics. Factors that influence the formation of bloodstain patterns are: surface tension and viscosity, drag and gravity and their influence on speed, and the shape of bloodstains when falling. In addition, surface conditions can affect the pattern of blood produced. Determining the area of "‹"‹origin of the bloodstain is carried out based on the impact angle calculated from the length and width of the bloodstain pattern. The analysis carried out in the experiment shows that there is closure in the bloodstain pattern analysis due to the assumption of a linear trajectory and determining the angle of the bloodstain. Different impact speeds will produce different bloodstain patterns.

Review

The titled work, "PHYSICS OF BLOODSTAIN PATTERN ANALYSIS," addresses a critical area within forensic science, focusing on the fundamental principles that govern bloodstain pattern formation. The abstract clearly outlines the paper's scope, aiming to elucidate how physics, in conjunction with biology and mathematics, underpins the analysis used for crime scene reconstruction. By delving into the physical factors influencing bloodstain development and interpretation, the paper positions itself to enhance the scientific rigor and understanding of this crucial evidentiary discipline. The abstract highlights several key physical parameters central to bloodstain dynamics, including surface tension, viscosity, drag, and gravity, and their collective influence on droplet speed and resulting morphology. It correctly identifies the standard methodology for determining the area of origin through impact angle calculations derived from stain length and width. Furthermore, the acknowledgement that "different impact speeds will produce different bloodstain patterns" indicates a practical, perhaps experimental, approach to exploring the variability and complexities inherent in bloodstain formation, which is essential for comprehensive pattern interpretation. A particularly noteworthy, yet slightly ambiguous, point raised in the abstract is the observation of "closure in the bloodstain pattern analysis due to the assumption of a linear trajectory and determining the angle of the bloodstain." This suggests a critical evaluation of inherent limitations or potential inaccuracies within current BPA methodologies, specifically concerning simplified assumptions about blood droplet physics. While the abstract implies an experimental basis for this finding, further elucidation on the precise nature of this "closure" and its practical ramifications for forensic analysis would greatly strengthen the paper's impact. Nevertheless, by both describing the operative physics and critically assessing its application, this work offers a valuable contribution towards refining and improving the scientific foundation of bloodstain pattern analysis.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.