Rika Kartika, Karim Suryadi, Rahmat, Syaifullah

Nation And Character Building: Pergulatan Ide Nasionalisme, Identitas dan Kohesivitas Masyarakat Majemuk

Introduction

Nation and character building: pergulatan ide nasionalisme, identitas dan kohesivitas masyarakat majemuk. Mengkaji nation and character building di masyarakat majemuk, artikel ini membahas pengelolaan identitas, nasionalisme, dan kohesivitas sosial untuk integrasi bangsa yang harmonis.

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas tantangan nation and character building dalam konteks masyarakat majemuk, dengan fokus pada bagaimana identitas yang majemuk dikelola dalam pembentukan karakter bangsa. Dalam era globalisasi, setiap negara dihadapkan pada tantangan mempertahankan jati diri bangsa serta mengelola potensi konflik identitas yang muncul. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan metode kajian pustaka, penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana nasionalisme, identitas etnis, dan agama dapat dikelola agar tidak mengancam integrasi sosial. Berdasarkan analisis berbagai praktik di berbagai negara, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pengelolaan identitas harus dilakukan secara proporsional dan inklusif agar dapat memperkuat kohesivitas sosial, serta mendukung pembangunan karakter nasional yang positif. Selain itu, pendidikan dan kebijakan memegang peran penting dalam menciptakan kohesi dan integrasi yang mendalam dalam masyarakat majemuk. Rekomendasi dari penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya kebijakan yang mendukung dialog antar kelompok etnis, agama sebagai cara untuk memperkuat nasionalisme yang sehat, mencegah disintegrasi, dan mencapai pembangunan bangsa yang lebih stabil dan harmonis.

Review

This article addresses a highly pertinent and complex issue: nation and character building within pluralistic societies, focusing on the critical challenge of managing diverse identities to forge a unified national character. The abstract outlines a qualitative literature review approach, drawing insights from practices across various countries to examine how nationalism, ethnic, and religious identities can be managed to prevent social disintegration. The research effectively highlights the imperative for proportional and inclusive identity management to strengthen social cohesion and foster positive national character, emphasizing the significant roles of education and policy in achieving deep societal integration. While the paper presents a valuable overview, the abstract could benefit from clarifying certain methodological and analytical specifics. The phrase "analisis berbagai praktik di berbagai negara" suggests a comparative element, yet the depth of this analysis and the specific criteria used to evaluate these practices as "proportional and inclusive" remain somewhat abstract. A clearer articulation of the analytical framework guiding the literature review would enhance the rigor. Furthermore, the concept of "nasionalisme yang sehat" (healthy nationalism) is crucial in this context but is not explicitly defined, leaving room for ambiguity regarding how it is distinguished from potentially divisive forms of nationalism within plural societies. Elaboration on these theoretical underpinnings would strengthen the paper's conceptual contribution. Despite these observations, this article makes a timely and important contribution to the discourse on national identity and social cohesion, particularly within diverse nations. Its focus on proactive management of identity and the critical role of policy and dialogue offers practical implications for policymakers and educators. By advocating for inclusive approaches, the study lays a solid conceptual foundation for understanding how nations can navigate the complexities of their internal diversity to build a more stable and harmonious future. The research effectively underlines the enduring relevance of thoughtful governance in fostering unity amidst pluralism.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.