Muhammad Harfi, Lukmanul Hakim, Ahmad Fikri, Jimmy Malintang, Rizki Ramadhan Sitepu

Analisis Teori Legitimasi Max Weber dalam Akun Youtube Kajian Tafsir Al-Ma’rifah-Ustadz Musthafa Umar

Introduction

Analisis teori legitimasi max weber dalam akun youtube kajian tafsir al-ma’rifah-ustadz musthafa umar. Analisis teori legitimasi Max Weber pada akun YouTube Ustadz Musthafa Umar. Temukan bagaimana otoritas tradisional, karismatik, dan legal-rasional diperkuat media digital untuk dakwah tafsir Al-Qur'an.

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis penerapan teori legitimasi Max Weber dalam kanal YouTube Kajian Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Ma’rifah Ustadz Musthafa Umar. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif-analitis, mengumpulkan data melalui observasi video, analisis komentar audiens, serta kajian literatur terkait legitimasi keagamaan dan digitalisasi dakwah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penelusuran terhadap Ustadz Mustafa Umar memperoleh legitimasi melalui kombinasi tiga otoritas Weberian: tradisional, karismatik, dan legal-rasional. Otoritas tradisionalnya berasal dari latar belakang keluarga dan pendidikan keagamaan, otoritas karismatiknya dibangun melalui gaya dakwah yang santun dan mudah dipahami, sementara otoritas legal-rasional diperkuat oleh jabatan keagamaan serta karyanya dalam bidang tafsir. Kehadiran kanal YouTube tidak hanya mempertahankan legitimasi tersebut tetapi juga memperluas jangkauan dakwah tafsir al-Qur’an kepada audiens yang lebih luas. Kesimpulannya, media digital bukanlah ancaman bagi otoritas keagamaan tradisional, melainkan alat yang memperkuatnya melalui adaptasi komunikasi yang lebih interaktif dan luas. Serta implikasinya terhadap jamaah adalah pemahaman terhadap al-Qur’an yang lebih luas serta semakin kokohnya akidah ahlussunah wal jamaah.

Review

The study "Analisis Teori Legitimasi Max Weber dalam Akun Youtube Kajian Tafsir Al-Ma’rifah-Ustadz Musthafa Umar" presents a timely and relevant analysis of religious authority in the digital age. By applying Max Weber's seminal theory of legitimacy, the research effectively unpacks how Ustadz Musthafa Umar establishes and maintains his influence on the YouTube platform. The abstract clearly outlines the study's qualitative, descriptive-analytical approach, meticulously detailing the sources of data from video observation to audience comments. A significant strength lies in its successful identification of the interplay between traditional, charismatic, and legal-rational forms of authority, demonstrating how these classical categories manifest and are reinforced within a contemporary digital context. While the paper commendably applies Weber's framework, there are areas that could benefit from deeper exploration. The claim that digital media *not only maintains but expands* legitimacy, and fundamentally *reinforces* traditional religious authority, is a powerful assertion that warrants more nuanced discussion. A critical reviewer might ask if there are any potential counter-effects or challenges posed by the digital environment that are not fully addressed, or if this positive reinforcement is universally applicable across different religious figures and contexts. Furthermore, the final implication regarding "semakin kokohnya akidah ahlussunah wal jamaah" is a strong normative statement that, while perhaps an observation of the study's subject, could benefit from a more academic distancing or a discussion of the methodology used to ascertain such a profound impact on congregational belief. Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of religious authority, media, and digital dakwah, providing concrete empirical evidence for the adaptability of traditional religious institutions in the face of technological change. The findings offer a compelling case for viewing digital platforms not as threats, but as strategic amplifiers for established religious figures. For future research, it would be insightful to explore comparative cases where digital media might *challenge* or *transform* legitimacy, or to investigate the long-term effects of such digital engagement on the internal dynamics of religious communities. With minor attention to further qualifying some of its broader claims and potentially expanding on the methodological rigor behind assessing impact on belief, this paper offers a solid foundation for further academic discourse in this important field.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.